When parents first learn their child has a hearing impairment, many thoughts and questions arise. Will my child be able to learn? Can they be successful in life? Will they be able to go to college? Will they have friends? How will they learn? Will they be able to have a job one day?
The answer is yes. With the appropriate education, deaf/hard of hearing students will be equally as successful as their hearing peers and will be afforded to same opportunities in life.
When parents learn of their child’s hearing loss, they must make many decisions as quickly as possible in order to set their child up for success. Once the hearing loss has been diagnosed, the parents should connect with local early intervention services (if the child is under the age of three) or with the local school system (if the child is over the age of three) in order to begin services for their child.
Success of a hearing impaired child depends on early intervention.
After deciding which form of amplification is to be used (hearing aids, BAHA system, cochlear implants), the family must decide which form is communication is best suited for their family – sign language, cued speech, listening and spoken language (WOULD THIS BE A GOOD PLACE TO PUT A LINK TO MY FIRST POST OR SHOULD I GO INTO THE SAME DETAIL ABOUT AMPLIFICATION AND COMMUNICATION MODES?) It is important to remember that any form of communication is the right choice. Just because a family chooses sign language doesn’t mean that is the right choice for all families. Just because another family chooses listening and spoken language or cued speech does not mean that is the right choice for all families.
Our son, Joseph, was born at 24 weeks gestation and diagnosed with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD) at six months of age while still in the NICU. Upon meeting with the ENT for the first time, he explained that hearing aids may or may not work for Joseph and that cochlear implants sometimes work for ANSD but sometimes they do not. He explained that Joseph may be able to learn speech and language through auditory verbal training or that he may need to use sign language. Because of his extreme prematurity, Joseph’s vision was in question so we were not sure if sign language would even be an option. We were very much in a “wait and see approach."
As soon as Joseph was discharged from the NICU, we began in home therapy through a local D/HH early intervention service. After much detailed conversation with our early intervention specialist and ENT, my husband and I made the decision to have Joseph fitted for hearing aids knowing they may or may not work and that he may need a cochlear implant(s). We also made the decision to start with an auditory verbal approach knowing he may need sign language later if it did not work.
Joseph received his first pair of hearing aids at the age of one and began auditory verbal therapy shortly thereafter. At the age of two, we enrolled Joseph in a private school for deaf/hard of hearing children. The school only used the auditory verbal/listening and spoken language approach. Joseph’s hearing aids began no longer working for his hearing loss and he became a candidate for a cochlear implant. He received his first cochlear implant at the age of three. He continued at the private school through preschool. He received his second cochlear implant just before starting public school kindergarten.
Joseph is now in kindergarten. He is in public school and goes to the school in our county that houses the deaf/hard of hearing classroom (it is not our home school). He is in a self-contained class with two other students who are deaf/hard of hearing. He mainstreams with a para-professional for music, art, and PE. (He has a para-professional with him because of health complications and multiple food allergies – not necessarily because of his hearing loss.)
We have continued with the auditory verbal and listening and spoken language approach for our family. This does not mean we are opposed to sign language or cued speech. They were not the best options for Joseph or our family. As Joseph got older, it became clear that he was an extremely visual learner despite a slight vision impairment. We knew that if we tried to teach him sign language, he would become dependent on it and not use spoken language (he also has verbal apraxia which made speaking difficult in the beginning but through countless hours of speech therapy, he has made great strides in speech and talks non-stop).
Again, every family has to make the choice that is best for our family. This is what worked best for Joseph and our family but may not be the best choice for another family.
Once an amplification system and mode of communication have been chosen, the family can then begin to decide on school choices for their child. The key to success is early intervention. The earlier a child begins to receive an appropriate education after their hearing loss diagnosis, the more likely the child will be just as successful as their hearing peers.
No matter the mode of communication that is chosen, there are many considerations a family should take into account when deciding on the appropriate school environment for their child:
A family must ultimately decide which form of communication and subsequent education are best for the family. As stated, there is no wrong decision. You have to decide what route is the best for your child and your family. The only wrong decision is not taking advantage of learning opportunities as early as possible in order to give your child maximum learning potential and opportunities.