When Are Self-Contained Special Education Classrooms (Ever) Okay?

Special education placement decisions are often difficult to navigate, filled with big emotions from both parents and teachers alike. Image from Unsplash

Tim Villegas February 10, 2020

The reality is that thousands of special education teachers and families confront this dilemma every day.

In this course, participants learn core principles, concepts, and methods of continuous improvement and explore the history of continuous improvement efforts. In a series of lectures, Master Black Belt in Six Sigma Shane Wentz, Ph.D., enables learners to enhance, optimize, and stabilize business processes and to augment quality control through varied methodologies. Participants gain the skills and knowledge to reimagine internal processes, engage in advanced problem-solving, and empower employees. The course covers high-level foundational principles of Lean, Six Sigma, and DMAIC processes before diving deep into Lean Six Sigma methods. Learners will analyze the tools of process mapping, Kaizen (a continuous improvement method/tool deemed a prerequisite for Lean transformation success), Lean (a continuous improvement philosophy that emphasizes streamlined workflows and reducing waste), and the process improvement methodology driving DMAIC: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control.

Entrepreneurs fostering new ventures outside of well-developed entrepreneurial ecosystems like Silicon Valley face significant challenges. These markets are unlike Silicon Valley, and they will likely remain so. That doesn't mean they can't nurture and sustain new businesses. In transitioning markets that lack abundant private sector financing, creative approaches from government officials, donors, and business leaders can fill the void to support entrepreneurial activity. Northeast Ohio (where Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University are located) has become a laboratory for such innovative solutions. During our time together in this course, we will explore some of these creative approaches to promoting regional entrepreneurship. Northeast Ohio has seen a massive infusion of government and donor resources for over ten years. In that time, Northeast Ohio has promoted regional development (including job creation and follow-on funding) through alternative methods of financing startups. It has not been easy. The region has made progress, but it remains to be seen whether it has struck upon an enduring formula. A dynamic entrepreneurial ecosystem takes many years, even decades, to develop. Government policymakers and donors typically seek quicker returns on their support programs, which makes long-term support for entrepreneurship challenging. This course includes case studies and first-person testimonials from entrepreneurs who have launched products and services ranging from medical devices to LED lights to whiskey. You will learn how these entrepreneurs discovered and procured resources from various programs and intermediary organizations. You will hear from business people still in the process of developing their companies as well as those whose ventures have flourished. Our focus will extend beyond Cleveland to selected markets around the world, including Greece, Vietnam, Tunisia, Argentina, Rwanda and China. You will learn about international incentives and other supports available to developing startups and small businesses across the globe. This course examines how different communities around the world approach implementing strategies and methods to support businesses. I will ask you to reflect on how to apply the principles we learn to growing entrepreneurship where you live. The social interactive features of the online platform will enable students from around the world to share ideas and learn from one another. Most MOOCs rebroadcast professors’ lectures; this course is different. Don’t expect to see me standing in front of the camera, talking and lecturing every module. Instead, the lectures will be relatively short in length. They have more of the feel of an engaging documentary than a static classroom setting. ## __What type of person takes the *Beyond Silicon Valley* course?__ - Active and aspiring businesspeople in communities looking to initiate new startup ecosystems or bolster existing ones - Current and prospective entrepreneurs who want to learn about funding sources, risk management, and the lifecycle of startups - Professionals who work in government agencies, nongovernmental organizations, philanthropic institutions, and various private funds that fund startups - Anyone curious about how to create and grow startup ecosystems outside the major tech hubs - The principles Beyond Silicon Valley teaches have been drawn from and applied to startups worldwide, from small villages to megalopolises. You'll study success stories spanning the globe from Vietnam to Kosovo to Botswana. ## __What will you learn in *Beyond Silicon Valley*?__ - How and where startups can find funding to get their businesses off the ground - What role government can play in encouraging startups and a healthy startup ecosystem - How anchor institutions such as universities and healthcare systems participate in startup ecosystems - How nongovernmental organizations support startups - How to raise funds from venture capitalists, angel investors, and accelerators - How to navigate challenging periods in the startup lifecycle - The importance of mentoring in successful startups

Article continues here

A few years ago, a colleague of mine asked me if I had an example of an "inclusion readiness" checklist to use when considering moving a student from a self-contained special education classroom into a lesser restrictive environment like a classroom with co-teaching services. For example, when a student shows evidence of being "ready" to go back to a regular class, then the team could have a discussion about what their services would look like.

With a straight face, I told them that the only requirement for inclusion is that the student is breathing. And while this may seem like a snarky answer, I believe it wholeheartedly. There is no checklist. But decisions like this are made every day in Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings all over the United States.

Placement decisions are often difficult to navigate, filled with big emotions from both parents and educators alike. So, if I believe that students should always be educated in the least restrictive environment, when is it (ever) appropriate for a student to be taught in a self-contained special education classroom?

I can hear my inclusion allies yelling at me from all around the world, "Don't answer that question! It's a trap!" But the reality is that hundreds of thousands of special education teachers and families confront this dilemma every time they come to an IEP meeting. Inclusion advocates don't do anyone any favors by reducing a school team's options down to a false dichotomy of "included" and "not included."

Placement decisions are inherently complicated because they depend on several factors. In the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), in conjunction with determining the least restrictive environment, there is something called the continuum of alternative placements. This continuum includes "instruction in regular classes, special classes, special schools, home instruction, and instruction in hospitals and institutions." It also notes to make a "provision for supplementary services (such as resource room or itinerant instruction) to be provided in conjunction with regular class placement."

Given that the law provides a continuum, doesn't that mean that it assumes that at least some children will be served in alternate locations than a general education classroom? The short answer is a substantially qualified "Yes."

When I explain this to families, I like to break it down in the most straightforward way possible. The IEP team has to ask themselves, "have we tried everything to make this student successful in the least restrictive environment?" If the answer is no, then the team must make changes to the student's services. If the answer is yes, then the team should consider alternate placement options.

A problem occurs when there is disagreement among the team about the answer to "have we tried everything?" I wish I could sit down with you and have a conversation about your particular child or student. I would give you my opinion about what else your IEP team could try. And there are great resources that can provide you tons of ideas. But all I can do is give you some questions that may be helpful for you when an alternate placement is considered by the team.

Does the curriculum need to be modified?

Modification of the curriculum should not be one of the main reasons why the team decides an alternate placement is required. The law states that "a child with a disability is not removed from education in age-appropriate regular classrooms solely because of needed modifications in the general education curriculum."

Let that sink in, y'all.

Is the general education classroom too overwhelming?

When I was a teacher in California, a 5th-grade general education classroom typically had 40 kids. Any student would have sensory issues with a class that large. For a student on the autism spectrum, it could be disastrous, even if the teacher had the best classroom management and visual supports. Again, the law states that “in selecting the LRE, consideration is given to any potential harmful effect on the child or on the quality of services that he or she needs."

One thing that I have learned from autistic advocates is that their input is rarely taken into consideration when the IEP team is discussing placement. If the team does decide to move to an alternate placement because of sensory issues or something else that is affecting the child, make sure that they consider when the student will have time with their peers.

What if people are getting injured?

As a special educator for over 15 years, I have been injured several times by my students. It is part of the job, and in the vast majority of cases, the student was not trying to hurt me or others. But there are cases where the school team has tried everything to help support the behavior of a student who causes injury to themselves or others. So the logical next step, after "have we tried everything?" is an alternate placement.

What you need to know about this consideration is that a student cannot be placed in a different program without parental consent. If the parent disagrees with the alternate placement, a hearing officer can be requested to weigh the evidence to determine if the school district has really done everything.

While that doesn't answer every question about placement, and when a separate environment should be considered, it is a start. By answering the question, "have we done everything we can to provide supplementary aids and services in regular classes?" you will get your answer. Though, you might get a different answer than the other members of the IEP team.

Questions or feedback? Email editor@noodle.com